Jump to content

What's a reasonable size for selling Mbuna?


Lee Miller

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I’m posting here because ‘chat’ is not permitted in the classifieds.

Once again someone (a newbie who possibly just needs to be set straight on these things) is advertising mbuna (demasoni) for sale at 1cm (quite reasonably priced though).

I’ve heard some horror stories of late about sales of mbuna that were only just beyond egg-sack stage. Survival rates have just got to suffer, as have the fish.

Any thoughts?

Should a moderator tap the seller on the shoulder and have a quiet word?

Stepping down from soap box now.

Cheers,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Lee I recently sent some demasoni at 1-1.5cm to Melbourne.

This was an experiment as much as anything and was between mates, not as a "sale".

We have both been surprised at the hardiness of the fish travelling at that size. What we didn't count on was the fish knocking each other off so easily at such a size in the new small confines.

I believe and I think the recipient agrees with me, that the bulk of the mortalities in the fish were caused by aggression in transit and not directly due to some weakness at that size. (As an aside, these fish were not purged like I would larger fish, only for about 20 hours, I don't believe their metabolism copes well with hunger at this age.)

I do not recommend this kind of thing though, and asking money for fish which (IMO and I have bred them in good numbers now) would have only been released by a holding mum inside a month ago is something I don't think I will ever do.

In the same breath though, if someone is prepared to buy them, and at the sellers asking price (they are notably reduced in price to what I, and others, charge for their larger cousins) then what do I care?

There may also be circumstances demanding the fish be offloaded with a minimum of delay.

I would rather see sales listed at 1cm where a buyer can make an informed decision regarding whether or not they can adequately take the fish on, than sales listed at incorrect sizes where a buyer then has to rethink his housing strategy to cope with poorly measured fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with all the comments made above...around 3cm would be minimum. However, if the sale was between experienced hobbyists who accept the risks and are capable of "special" considerations/care, then 1cm is fine too. I had some 1cm mbuna sent to me from NSW by a forum member whom I trust. They are all prospering, breeding etc. here in Perth 12 months on. So I guess it is up to the individuals concerned.

Andrea smile.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i was wondering how long it would take for a reaction to that thread

My reply to the post was removed quickly laugh.gif

I agree with Sardukar's thinking thumb.gif and would never buy fish that small unless the fish where only 2-3cm when fully grown tongue.gif

raisehand.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the guy selling the fish has been in the hobby for at least 5 years , so his not a newbie. tongue.gif

another thing is that the fish are larger then 1cm their at least 2cm and the larger ones are 2.5cm.when he sells his fish he always advertises them smaller then what they really are,unlike alot of people in this hobby.i recently swapped my polits for a pair of peppermints from simon and he told they were around the 5cm mark and when we measured them one was 8.5cm the other 7cm so i think you know were im coming from.

who ever is interested in some demansoni give him a call and go view them,your not going to lose anything and only going to get a bargin thumbup.gif .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you made some good points Omar but to state a fish is only 1-1.5cm is going to cause an riot on this forum. At that size i would at least advertise them at 2cm and save the hassle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you made some good points Omar but to state a fish is only 1-1.5cm is going to cause an riot on this forum. At that size i would at least advertise them at 2cm and save the hassle

yeah i know what you mean LOL.gif good luck to him selling them and how ever buys them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Ducksta`s man in melbourne is me, and im 95% sure the drop off`s were only due to aggression wink2.gif There would have been 45-60 @1cm and i reckon ive still got 30 kicking (now 2 weeks later) so im pretty happy! Nearly all the ones which died were already skinned and eye less by the time i got them out of the bags, so maybe there not the right fish to be sending at 1cm in a small bag but i think between freinds (and serious hobbiests) its "doable" with the right species but probably not the best idea.

The Boronia Forums were thinking about writting some sort of ethical standards into there guidelines. Weve had a few people trying to sell BN @1cm and some american fry which had just become free swimming but when we explained to the members and clearly showed the diffrence between a 2 week old BN and a 2 month old BN, even the sellers agreed they shouldnt be selling them yet. I think youve got to presume ignorance and explain it to them, if they chose to continue to do it then there isnt alot you can do except hope that no-one buys them.

I think we should have some sort of a "ethical guidelines" so in these situation we can remind them that what there doing may be considered un-ethical by alot of fish keepers and may be detremental to the fish`s health, i think it would be unfair to lock a post and say "contact him in 6 weeks when the fry are ready" when we have no idea how big they will be then either, it really is a case of "buyer beware" but also reminding them that in the eyes of alot of people in the hobby they will be acting "unethicaly". thumb.gif

Cheers Andy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should we have a list, somewhere in the forums of species to be bagged separately? I know Tropheus and some other cichlid species are often shipped in small bags with oxygen this way. Might help some newbies out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey

The guy selling them is not a newbie and I have known him for several years - he is a very good fish keeper. I also agree with Hilal in that he is understating the size of his fish - I was at his house on the weekend and the demasoni are very good quality and a good size - just too cheap.

As someone who has bought many fish of many different people in the hobby I definitely prefer to be underquoted the size and when I go to pick them up be pleasantly surprised - too many times I have bought fish and told they are 3 cm's and when I have picked them up they are 2cm. That is unethical and happens too often in the hobby.

If he wants to sell fish at that size it is his prerogative - he certainly has adjusted his price to match the size. He is not making any misrepresentations about the sizing.

Grant

Link to comment
Share on other sites

even if the fish are bigger than stated, it is still going to cause issues any time someone advertises fish that small for sale. its all well and good to be conservative in your fish sizing, but quoting fish at half their size is perhaps a little TOO conservative in sizing. usually the best way is to measure the smallest fish and just advertise that as your size, that way people can still be happy when getting larger ones, but you wont be selling under the size you quote....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys,

To be honest, my demasoni fry are of good quality. I bought the parents from Roland Tarr. Most of the fry ( 95% I would say) have straight bars.

To confirm, the 1cm+ fry I advertised are about 1.2cm or so (not 2cm as Omar said). They are not weak fish and not just came out of their mother's mouth with egg sack on their belly. Definitely they are more than 1 month old after the mother spit them out. The mother of these fry has produced another 38 fry 3 days ago. Therefore I need to let go to make room for their younger sibling which is currently in the fry saver. Also I want to make these awesome fish more affordable. Like thropheus, as you all know, the more you have them in the tank, the better. Not all people can afford $200 for 10 demasoni. If you can spend just $50 for 12 fish, why not?

Simon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Simon

People wont pay $50 if theres a good chance the fish will die. Fry that size are very tempremental when it comes to Ph and temp change and thats, IMHO, where the problem lies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all,

I was the first to reply to the original post, prior to it's deletion as 'chit chat' and commented then what a bargain they were at this price.

Demasoni only made a comeback into the hobby a couple of years ago and I snapped them up then as I love them dearly smile.gif .

The fact that they have held their market value is testament to their beauty but also their nature, as most can have difficulty in rearing these demons. Though they take extra care however, we are definately seeing more and more in the market although I have noticed a deterioration of quality in some strains as well.

Breeding both these and Tropheus which places the dollars at the mid-high range of the market, my only concern with price drops of that nature or comments such as "if you can spend $50 on 12 fish" make me wary. I too have done deals with IMO reputable fish keepers when larger quantities are bought, however it has been my experience also, that individual's appear sad.gif to take more care when they pay what the fish is worth on the market.

I know of many that have wanted demasoni and found the price prohibitive and the queries have come from the newer sector of the hobby cool.gif

Just my thoughts.

Cheers

Aline

Link to comment
Share on other sites

simon i applaud you its good to see someone in this hobby that puts the hobby before thier own greed.im a firm believer that fish should belong to people who deserve them not those that can afford them.(unfortunately not a few shared by many) if your not going to buy them why worry.if your not going to buy them then why worry about what simons doing.ive recently recieved a few fish from well known members of this board that were 1 cm or just above and thier all going strong.i find it better to get them at that size because then you can segregate them and raise them in a better environment with less competiton from their siblings.5 to 10 fish will grow faster in a tank as apposed to 20 to 30.the only unethical thng ive seen recently is this post as its done is jepordise simons chance of selling his fish which is a shame.

ps.i dont know what everyonesworried about anyway if all goes well all simons fish will die leaving less fish in the market thus keeping the prices of these fish ridculously high LOL.gif .if you dont agree with what ive written above that at least has got to strike a cord with you tongue.gif once again simon clap.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i also agree with what aline said in that the quality of some strains has deteriorated.i think it due to people trying to cash in on them while thier market values still high.indiscriminate breeding in order to profit.its interesting to see that alot of the negative posters are also demasoni sellers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*EDIT*In the interest of harmony I will remove my own post

I guess I am greedy buying and breeding expensive fish

I also bought and sold a fair few demasoni and done the right thing with them. zipit.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

blink.gif i'm not sure how this thread got so off topic...but anway rolleyes.gif I think its up to the buyer; no one is forcing you to buy small fish. And if your buying from someone on these forums, then their bound to be an enthusiast of our great hobby and interest.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...