benno84 Posted January 11, 2014 Share Posted January 11, 2014 its looking like I got a couple of them also from the major auction. ended up with 42. was either 5 or 6 lots.id be happy to put them in a display tank but they was purchased for breeding spent over $120 on them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Link2Hell Posted January 14, 2014 Share Posted January 14, 2014 Benno and Jasoncan you guys note down the dates you bought themand your bidding number to pass on to Lionel so hehas some details to follow up withI'm guessing it was a major auction March or Oct Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benno84 Posted January 15, 2014 Share Posted January 15, 2014 mine was October.I brought 5 lotsqty 9 9 9 8 7I had a visitors number Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dazzman Posted January 17, 2014 Share Posted January 17, 2014 so what will you guys do with the fish now?if the person who sold the fish can be found will they be asked to take back the fish and monies refunded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Link2Hell Posted January 18, 2014 Share Posted January 18, 2014 Daz that is up to the committee and the people involvedI have my thoughts but it's not my call Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Link2Hell Posted March 3, 2014 Share Posted March 3, 2014 Hi AllI have had a reply from Ad to this questionHi Adwe have a couple of problems with Ps. saulousi that have popped up inAustralia over the past 6 months but I feel have been building longer Ps. saulousi appear to have a contamination problem with what appearsto possibly be M. interruptus or Ps. msobo there are 2 problems but I feel they could have the same beginning I have attached some pics of the fish ones labeled P s 001-007 are what have been traded as Ps. saulousi both through the New South Wales Cichlid Society and in some LFS andthe problem hasn’t been highlighted till the males have started to change colour these are the fish already posted here by Jason the ones labeled P s new 001 – 002 are suppose to be new locale varientthat were purchased as F1 from wild caught these are pics sent from Newcastlecan you have a look and give your opinion please I just want to add that it would be extremely unlikely Australia would havesomething that new it hadn't been documented somewhere else in the world and his reply was You are right, both of these don't look right and it looks like a female Ps. interruptus was crossed with a male Ps. saulosi. The narrowing of the vertical bars on the male is something typical of interruptus; also thelight blue markings behind the eye. I think it is fair to say that these are hybrids and not a "new" locality of which I haven't yet heard of.Enjoy your cichlids!Ad Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.