Willy Wombat Posted December 10, 2003 Share Posted December 10, 2003 For your information- Interesting stance taken on glofish by the FDA... FDA statementWhat do you think about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dviv Posted December 10, 2003 Share Posted December 10, 2003 That's dissapointing. :o Though the governenment of calfornia has banned them for a different reason. So at least some peole realise what a huge problem it is.As far as the food and drugs association goes, they aren't different.It's only from a hobby/cruelty pont of view that there is an actual problem.Will be very interesting to see how this develops over the next few months Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Miller Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 Hi David,You've mentioned "cruelty". I usually associate this with fish dyed by injection. The FDA statement relates to "...genetically engineered zebra danio fish..."I might be wrong, but it seems like we're talking about two separate issues (not that that makes either of them right!)Cheers, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YeW Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 Hi Lee -We certainly are talking about two separate issues .I agree with Griffin and a few others on this topic, if we are going to "colour" fish artificially then better to do it this way than with a hypodermic needle.Not that I think it is a useful or appropriate use of the technology. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dviv Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 Yeah definately,by hobby/cruelty I meant and/or, so I could probably have worded that better : While I do think that it is pretty amazing (and kinda cool) to be able to do that kind of thing to an animal, I still don't believe in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrseby Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 Hay guys look what i found :D Because tropical aquarium fish are not used for food purposes, they pose no threat to the food supply. There is no evidence that FRONTOSA fish pose any more threat to the environment than the current local population which have long been widely sold in the Australia. In the absence of a clear risk to the public health, AQIS finds no reason to regulate these particular fish.HAHAH ONLY WISH !!!!!! :lol: AND YET GOLDFISH ARE ALLOWED IN MMMMMMMMHAHAHA BE GOOD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dviv Posted December 11, 2003 Share Posted December 11, 2003 The FDA is only about consumable food and drugs, so they don't care about fisheries or wildlife or anything like that.All they are saying is that "they" are not going to get involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.