Jump to content

L168


onlyme

Recommended Posts

My understanding is that L168 is Dekeyseria brachyura (Kner, 1854).

It also goes under the synonyms Ancistrus brachyurus and Peckoltia brachyura and some of the older books had it listed as Peckoltia pulcher. It was even assigned to a pleco genus Zonancistrus but this has not been accepted for scientific usage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nomenclature is a rather plastic affair and names can be changes regularly as new revised classification systems come into play. In actual fact D. brachura (I think this is the most recent and widely accepted name) is a good example of this with more than a few different scientific names which Ged has exhaustively posted up. Its ironic though that one of the least scientific names, one which was designed to be temporary is the one we, I at least, most commonly associate with this fish i.e. L168, go figure.

-Mat-

ps I think genii is a race of aliens on Stargate Atlantis bigsmile.gif . The plural of genus is genera. smile.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to complicate things a little bit further,,, L052 and L16***???? no number allocated. Are these the same fish ???

Not an unreasonable senario, the same species, different colour varieties, different localities,,,,,just like the Australian rainbows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It seems that 52's and 168's are almost the same fish - only the 52's tend to develop spottier less defined patterns as they get older where as the 168's tend to remain striped. Personally I'm under the belief that they are the same species just different morphs. Same thing with cats/dogs etc where a specific breed can have multiple coat patterns. You will probably find that given they come from two seperate rivers that occasinally merge during flood seasons that they have just developed to reflect their environment and predators.

Personally I prefer the 168's as when they are in a good mood their stripes become extremely well defined similar to other stripey plecs such as the much sought after zebra. Just comes down to personal preference though - and you will find that aside from patterning both classifications require condtions and behave identically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah, I understand the mistake, genii is the plural of genius not genus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...